‘Importing radical Islam will destroy America’: Texas congressman Brandon Gill warns of ‘penalties like Europe’ | World Information – The Occasions of India – Worldwide Dispatch

Texas lawmaker Brandon Gill has triggered a pointy on-line debate after posting a video of his congressional speech on immigration and Islam. Within the clip, Gill argues that what he calls “radical Islam” has been imported into america by means of current immigration insurance policies and poses a menace to American values. He attracts a comparability with Europe, warning that related insurance policies there have led to safety, social, and cultural issues. The publish rapidly went viral, attracting thousands and thousands of views and tens of 1000’s of likes, whereas prompting each robust help and intense criticism.

Brandon Gill’s viral remarks

Gill’s feedback had been delivered on the Home flooring and later shared on X. Within the video, he claims Islam didn’t arrive in America with the nation’s founding and hyperlinks up to date immigration to the unfold of extremist ideology. He frames the problem as one in all nationwide safety and constitutional order, arguing that the US ought to study from Europe’s expertise.The lawmaker didn’t cite particular European international locations or insurance policies within the speech, however his language echoes arguments steadily utilized by critics of large-scale debate over migration in Europe over the previous decade.

Supporters of Gill’s place sometimes level to a mixture of safety and social challenges in Europe. These embody jihadist assaults in cities similar to Paris, Brussels, Manchester, and London since 2014, some involving European-born residents influenced by extremist teams similar to ISIS. European authorities have additionally raised issues about radicalisation in prisons, failures of integration in some city areas, and the emergence of segregated communities typically described as “parallel societies”.Gill’s warning additionally aligns with debates in international locations like France, Germany, and Sweden, the place governments have struggled to stability non secular freedom with secular legislation amid issues about extremist preaching, antisemitic violence, and public order. Critics of European migration coverage argue these pressures have contributed to public backlash and the rise of right-wing events throughout the continent.

Viral response on-line

Supportive replies praised him for what they described as bluntness on immigration and nationwide safety. Some supporters argued that Europe’s expertise reveals the dangers of failing to confront extremism early and known as for tighter US immigration controls.One extensively shared supportive response accused US leaders of ignoring threats posed by extremist actions and argued that European governments had been now paying the value. Different approving feedback echoed Gill’s declare that radical Islamist ideology is incompatible with Western constitutional methods.On the similar time, many customers challenged Gill’s framing. Critics argued that his remarks conflated Islam as a faith with extremist actions and neglected the lengthy historical past of Muslims in America, together with enslaved Africans delivered to North America within the 18th century.

The Sharia Free America Caucus

Gill has additionally promoted his involvement within the Sharia Free America Caucus, launched in January 2026 by Keith Self and Chip Roy. The caucus says it goals to stop any incorporation of Sharia legislation into US governance.In keeping with its organisers, the group expanded rapidly in its first weeks, drawing members from 17 states. Supporters describe the caucus as a symbolic defence of constitutional legislation, whereas critics argue it targets an issue that doesn’t exist in US courts and dangers stigmatising Muslim communities.

A well-known political fault line

The response to Gill’s feedback highlights a long-running divide in US politics over immigration, faith, and nationwide id. Comparable arguments have surfaced repeatedly after terrorist assaults in Europe or in periods of elevated migration. Gill’s supporters view Europe as a cautionary story concerning the penalties of radical immigration. Because the video continues to flow into, his remarks have change into one other flashpoint within the broader debate over how america balances immigration coverage, nationwide safety, and spiritual freedom in an period of worldwide migration.