Residents coalition submits memorandum of objections to proposed GMCC | Mysuru Information – The Occasions of India

Mysuru: A coalition of involved residents and civil society organisations has submitted a memorandum of objections to the proposed Larger Mysuru Metropolis Company (GMCC), urging the state govt to withdraw the notification and undertake a scientific and participatory planning course of.The memorandum was submitted in Bengaluru to the Division of Municipal Administration (DMA) beneath the division of city growth. The residents’ coalition, working beneath the banner “Larger Mysuru with Nice Imaginative and prescient”, introduced collectively environmental teams, farmers’ collectives, skilled associations, resident welfare our bodies, and citizen boards from Mysuru metropolis and surrounding rural areas.Dr Shushrutha Gowda clarified that the coalition just isn’t against growth however strongly objected to unplanned and opaque enlargement. “Cities should develop and infrastructure should enhance. However growth with out scientific knowledge, correct planning, and democratic session just isn’t progress; it results in irreversible harm,” he mentioned, including that the current GMCC proposal lacked transparency and sufficient groundwork. Mysore Grahakara Parishad founding president Bhamy V Shenoy warned that there was no publicly obtainable environmental influence evaluation. He mentioned lakes, wetlands, inexperienced belts, and wildlife corridors could be severely affected if the challenge proceeded with out safeguards.The memorandum listed a collection of issues, together with the absence of gram sabha and ward committee consultations, lack of an in depth Grasp Plan, unresolved problems with water shortage, sewage, flooding, site visitors congestion, and stable waste administration, and the hostile influence on farmers and rural livelihoods. It additionally flagged potential will increase in taxes and utility prices, threats to Chamundi Hills and eco-sensitive zones, lack of local weather and catastrophe preparedness, and fears that the challenge was pushed by speculative actual property pursuits.Representatives of farmers’ and group teams mentioned that rural communities would bear the brunt of the enlargement. They warned of misery land gross sales, lack of agricultural livelihoods, and widening rural–city inequality. Ladies’s teams and citizen boards mentioned middle-class households, pensioners, and every day wage earners could be burdened by rising prices.Sujatha S of Nimishamba Self Assist Group and Dasarath of Namma Mysuru Basis mentioned that the proposal would disproportionately damage rural communities.The coalition demanded withdrawal of the notification, publication of a scientific Grasp Plan, environmental and well being influence assessments, statutory public hearings, and safety of farmers, lakes, and eco-sensitive zones.